A study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a new teaching method aimed at improving students’ performance in a mathematics examination. Data were collected from 50 students, each of whom took a pre-test (before the introduction of the new method) and a post-test (after its implementation). In both assessments, students’ outcomes were classified as either “Pass” or “Fail.”
The results are summarized as follows:
- In the pre-test, 25 students passed and 25 students failed.
- In the post-test, 35 students passed and 15 students failed.
- Of the students who passed the pre-test, 20 also passed the post-test.
- Of the students who failed the pre-test, 15 subsequently passed the post-test.
These results can be represented in the following contingency table:
| Passed Pre-test (Yes) |
20 |
5 |
| Passed Pre-test (No) |
15 |
10 |
The objective of this analysis is to determine whether there is a significant change in the proportion of students who passed before and after the introduction of the new teaching method.
This comparison involves paired categorical data, making it suitable for testing with McNemar’s Test, which assesses whether the proportion of discordant pairs (i.e., students who changed from pass→fail or fail→pass) differs significantly.